Wednesday, October 31, 2012

More credible Authors' Books about President Obama - Part 2

Yesterday in Part 1, we saw political analyst Dinesh D’Souza’s impression of President Obama’s ideology. I’ve also previously recapped liberal reporter Ed Klein’s The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House).

Now here’s a book by a young financial banking insider who admits being extremely liberal and completely taken in by Obama in the 2008 election. Shawn Smeltz, author of USA: Unaware, Scared and Angry, says all that has changed for him; his eyes have been opened by the last four years.
Smeltz isn't a professional writer or wealthy Wall Street financial tycoon. He’s a middle-management bank employee making a modest middle-class living, who felt compelled to share his insight with the public. He tells of his experiences being instructed to lay people off after the failure of 26 banks; the home mortgage foreclosures and the failure of Wall Street even after the second stimulus money toward the beginning of Obama’s first term.
Things may have started before Obama’s election, Smeltz says, but they’ve only gotten worse through actions that cannot be blamed on the Bush Administration (and which actually began under Clinton).
Smeltz now feels like a victim of what he calls a poison message by Obama (p.21); the message of “change” and Obama’s disbelief in America’s exceptionalism. This message not only targeted poor people, but hardworking citizens who try to excel. The message of change clouded peoples’ convictions and desire to do the right thing (p.22).
He says Obama’s arrogance began increasing behind the scenes; that the president’s  lack of experience in managing or leading people was overtaken by his charisma (p.54). This agrees with Klein’s assessment.
It became obvious to Smeltz that Obama’s idea of success was something dictated by a ruling authority – not success through hard work (p.54-55 – written even before Obama said “You didn’t build that.”)
Through Smeltz’s financial training, he realized the Obama administration’s new rules would destroy the economy instead of rebuild it (p.68). With overreaching regulations like those in the Dodd Frank Act of 2010, it became impossible to keep circulating money back into the economy, and that Obama began treating the banking industry like America’s enemy (p.76).
He says Obama’s plans became clearer: Take away individual success and replace it with government control and redistribution (p.89).
Here’s one harrowing story Smeltz tells of how the government encourages citizens to remain dependent on things like welfare (p.97-101):
He hired a young single mother. She showed great promise, was capable and dependable. The job was giving her a sense of pride. One day she came to Smeltz and said she had to quit, because she was on government subsidies. She’d gotten a letter saying if she kept working, they’d have to take some of her benefits away (benefits she qualified for, even though she had a job). Her bank salary wasn’t as much as these benefits, and her children would suffer without the extra money.
Smeltz told her he could offer her a raise after she was there a certain amount of time, but it wasn’t enough. She had to quit, and went back to fully living off the government. He says her future with the bank could have been brilliant.
Smeltz saw leftists, Democrats and liberals labeling prosperous individuals as being selfish and crooked. Their goal was to appeal to those less fortunate – and to people who didn’t want to put any effort into improving themselves but were content to blame others (p.122).
Smeltz, knowing more about how Wall Street functions than the average citizen, says Obama was wrong to embrace the Occupy Wall Street anti-capitalist uprising without ever addressing the rapes, drug use and pillaging being caused in the streets by these rebels (p.132).
But perhaps his biggest shock was seeing the similarity between Obama’s actions and Marxist/Communist governments:
Smeltz’s wife is from the Ukraine, and he’s been there numerous times to visit her family. He says Obama’s tactics are similar to Ukranian government: If individuals made more than the government allotted, the government would confiscate it and distribute it “as it saw fit” (p.137 –sounds like Obama’s limit of making $250,000 before more taxes will be taken). Most Ukrainian people lived below USA poverty standards.
Smeltz said the government controlled everything in the Ukraine, like when your hot water could be on, and what was sold in the markets. Even with the government taking the people’s money, the roads and bridges were nearly falling apart everywhere (p.173,140).
Smeltz concludes that our situation is clearly a result of this president’s failure to do anything to benefit the American people (p.149) – no one else’s.
One, two or three authors not enough proof for you? Here’s another about President Obama’s plans for America: Fool MeTwice: Obama’s Shocking Plans for the Next Four Years. It's Aaron Klein and Brenda Elliott’s third in-depth study of Obama, including his links to Marxist philosophy. They are both New York Times best-selling authors.

(This writer is not receiving any compensation or recognition for mentioning the above books.)
read more "More credible Authors' Books about President Obama - Part 2"

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

More Credible Authors' books about President Obama - Part 1

I read Dinesh D’Souza’s bestselling book, Obama’s America: Unmaking the American Dream, and now can't decide which is more compelling - the book, or his acclaimed movie, “2016.”

D’Souza is a political analyst who was born and raised through his teen years in Mumbai, India. He came to America for college. Today, he’s considered one of America’s top political thinkers and has had articles in most mainstream magazines.
In “2016,” D’Souza says he got a stark eye-opener to find people in America living in-between the very wealthy and the very poor. In most communities in India’s caste system, there was no such thing as a middle class, and no way out of poverty unless you went elsewhere. 
He says Americans don’t realize what we have here. Although capitalism’s not perfect, it’s better than the alternatives. Our poor people are considered “rich” by most dictators’ standards. So imagine how much worse it could get.
“2016” then explores how Barack Obama was raised, and how he attained the philosophies he has carried into the White House about America being not much more than a “bully” to other countries, and about the “redistribution of wealth” – a tactic often employed in socialism and communism.
D’Souza says, through his life experience, wealth redistribution does only one thing – strips the wealthy families and makes the government rich. The money never trickles down to poor people…the system only ends up making more people poor. While government officials & royalty live in luxury, the poor continue to suffer.     
(My own perfect example of this - President and First Lady Marcos of the Philippines. For those unfamiliar, “President” Marcos stopped elections, became a dictator, and usurped the wealth of his country by notoriously spending government money with his wife.)
“2016” delves into Obama’s upbringing in Hawaii. His mother was influenced by his father with communist ideas. She rejected her second husband’s belief in free enterprise and wanted Obama mentored with anti-colonialist (we’d call it anti-establishment) ideas. So she put him under the mentoring of Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying member of the Communist party. Usually, psychologists will tell us we become what we learned in our formative years. Criminals even blame their childhoods for their crimes. Yet, we are asked to ignore what Obama learned during his upbringing. 
Back to D’Souza’s book… In “Obama’s America,” D’Souza says that although there are problems in both major political parties, it is obvious to insiders that Obama has no desire to keep America a Number One nation (p. 7).
There is evidence that Obama argues with black community leaders over black issues like inner-city poverty (p. 23). Even Democratic Rep Maxine Waters (whom I’m sure will nevertheless vote for Obama again) has said black families are still hurting and the president doesn’t maintain a high visibility in poor black communities (p. 23,24).
Obama’s policies, described throughout, promote reduction of America’s access to energy at home (p.138) while granting money and access to at least three other countries to drill off our shores (p. 139).
D’Souza’s interviews and research prove the president deliberately increases the debt in order to shrink America’s world power because he considers America to be an oppressor (p. 190).
Very little of Obama’s questionable activities and associates described by D’Souza are reported by mainstream media (p.209).
To make a long story short, the book confirms, through harrowing insider experiences and interviews, much of what conservative news sources report. But all of it is poo-pooed by more liberal news stations and Democratic politicians who never bothered to properly vet the president.
People will say D’Souza is a far-right conservative. But I’ve previously recapped a book by a very liberal reporter that backs up much of D'Souza's findings: Ed Klein’s The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House.
And there is yet another, by a young financial banking insider who admits being extremely liberal and completely taken in by Obama in the 2008 election. Shawn Smeltz says all that has changed for him; his eyes have been opened by the last four years. See this in Part 2.
(This writer has not received any compensation or recognition for reviewing the books mentioned herein.)
read more "More Credible Authors' books about President Obama - Part 1"

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

What Really Happened with God at the 2012 Democratic Convention?

For the purpose of this post, let’s be sure we know that a political party’s “platform” isn’t just the thing that’s built for speakers to stand on at the Conventions! I was surprised in talking with several people who had no idea what a “party platform” is.

A party’s platform is the document that states what they represent, and what ideas and ideals will be the foundation of a candidate’s term in office.

As an article at CBN News stated: In 2004, the Democratic platform mentioned God seven times in relationship to the rights and capabilities of Americans. In 2008 God was mentioned once, about everyone having a chance to “make the most of their God-given potential.”

This year, prior to the Convention, the Democratic platform made no mention of God. Instead it said “each one of us should be able to go as far as our talent and drive take us.”

The document also refused to call Jerusalem the capital of Israel (many leftists and liberals feel it is the capital of what should be Palestine).

Concerned individuals and religious groups called the media’s attention to the fact that there was no mention of God. President Obama started getting questions and pressure from all sides and even members of his own party.

This pressure is probably the one and only reason he sent Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa out onto the podium that Wednesday night at the DNC to “take a vote” of the delegates to see who wanted God (and Jerusalem) re-inserted back in the party’s platform.

The vote should be remembered as a disastrous moment for the Democratic Party (quick, see the video here before it’s suspiciously taken down like many other copies). NOTE: The first vote in the video is just a vote to allow the re-insertion amendment to be read. Keep listening for the vote to actually put God back in the party’s document.

After having the re-insertion amendment read for the attendees, Villaraigosa took three votes about whether to accept the amendment putting God back in the platform. The first two times, the Yeas and Nays were about even. He couldn’t get a reliable “Yes” for God. There were, in fact, many adamant “Boos” against God. After the second time, Villaraigosa didn’t know what to do. He looked around; a lady stepped forward and told him something, so he asked the room again.

The third time, it is discernable in the video that the “Nays” actually outweighed the “Yeas.” But Villaraigosa said “OK, in the opinion of the chair, two-thirds of the vote is in the affirmative.” There was again loud booing.

It was obvious he’d been given instructions to accept the amendment before a vote was ever taken. The Obama administration refused to lose face by letting the Nays have it. After that night, various Democrats began saying they ‘couldn’t let the citizens believe the party didn’t care about God.’

Any Christian or Jewish person who saw the event or sees this video should have trouble continuing to identify with the Democratic party, or at least with this particular White House that took God out of the document.

Hebrew Scriptures:

Joshua 24:15: “…As for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.”

Ezra 9:1: “The priests and the Levites have not kept themselves separate from the neighboring peoples with their detestable practices…”

New Testament:

Ephesians 5:11: “Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.”

1 John 1:6
“If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth.”

The 2012 Democratic platform now has one mention of God re-inserted. All evidence of the previous version is gone.

The 2012 Republican platform contains 12 references to God or various words like Divine Providence.

Mitt Romney may not believe in Jesus exactly the way Catholics and Protestants do, but he doesn’t boo God. He stands more for Godly values than our current president.

You’ve seen how a government without God is taking our nation downward instead of upward toward new success. What about your own success? Does it depend on God or worldly things? See my pocket-size Devotional, “God Am I Nobody?” in the near right column.

Did you like this post? See the earlier post, What Happens When People View Government As God?
read more "What Really Happened with God at the 2012 Democratic Convention?"

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Politicians' Photo Quiz for American Voters

American Voters: Do you know who these people are, and whether they have something to do with the current election cycle? Test your political knowledge:
1.  Identify as many photos as possible.
2. Answer this Bonus Question: Which of them will lose their jobs if Mitt Romney wins, and which of them is unemployed if President Obama stays in office?
3. Then ask yourself: Shouldn't I know this stuff before I vote?

Photo Answers:                                    
Top row, Left to Right: President Barack Obama; Vice President Joe Biden.
Row 2, Center: Speaker of the House John Boehner.
Row 3, Left to Right: Presidential Candidate Gov. Mitt Romney; House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.  
Row 4, Left to Right: Vice-Presidential Candidate Rep. Paul Ryan; Pres. George W. Bush's first Secretary of State Colin Powell. 
Row 5, Left to Right: Obama's Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; House Minority Leader and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.
Row 6, Left to Right: Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court John Roberts, who cast the deciding vote that Obamacare is, for the most part, classified as a Tax; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Row 7, Center: He's just the guy who still gets blamed for everything (or, in case you've been in outer space for twelve years, our last President, George W. Bush). 

Bonus Question Answer:
-If Mitt Romney wins, then Obama, Biden and Clinton need to go job-hunting.
-If Obama wins, V.P. candidate Paul Ryan is hoping to continue his U.S. House seat for another term. He is actually up for re-election now. The state of Wisconsin does not require that a Congress member give up his/her seat to run for higher office. Mitt Romney can return to private business or possibly seek another public office.
-No matter who wins: House Reps. Boehner and Cantor, and Senators Pelosi and Reid remain in office unless they are defeated in their next campaigns for re-election or they vacate their seat. However, they are elected by their fellow House and Senate members to their leadership rolls in Congress, and could be replaced as leaders for one of two reasons:
1. The majority or minority shifts to the other party because of new seat winners from the opposing party.
2. They choose not to continue and help nominate someone else.
-Former Secy. of State Powell and former President Bush are unaffected. They are retired from official office, pursuing speaking and writing opportunities.
-Justice Roberts has his Supreme Court job for life.
So, how did you do? Do you know enough to vote? Don't forget to also brush up on the various officials running for your state's offices, like judges and school board members, and seek information on any Ballot Amendments.
If you're a glutton for punishment, answer my NonPartisan U.S. Government Quiz questions here.
(All photos are official U.S. government photos, and thereby in the public domain to be used without permission).

read more "Politicians' Photo Quiz for American Voters"

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

NonPartisan Quiz on U.S. Government for American Voters

Radio/TV personality Howard Stern recently shared some man-on-the-street interviews of American voters who seemed “clueless” (his chosen word) about U.S. Government. Whether it’s Letterman, Leno or someone else posing the questions, we’ve seen these often around election time, where people can’t name the Vice-President, or recognize politicians' photos, etc. It’s heartbreaking to see how uninformed our citizens are.

It's surprising that the usually liberal Stern targets only President Obama’s supporters in the video. We can be sure that clueless Americans exist on all sides of issues and parties...and many will enter the voting booth in less than a month.

So here’s a nonpartisan Quiz you can take to see how much you know about U.S. Government before voting on November 6 (no peeking at answers below first!):

1. Name the three branches of U.S. Government.

2. Who is President Obama’s Vice-President? If anything happened to both of them, what position is next in line as President, and who currently holds that position?

3. Providing “checks and balances” in our government is:
    a. the job of the U.S. Treasury.
    b. the job of the Supreme Court.
    c. the reason we have three branches of government.

4. True or False: The Declaration of Independence starts out: “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union…”

5. True or False: The Constitution and The Bill of Rights are two separate documents.

6. Name the first three presidents of the United States, and the 16th president.

Okay– we’re going to get a little harder now:

7. Name at least 5 of the 15 Cabinet Departments and which branch of government they’re in.

8. Which Constitutional Amendment gave women the right to vote, and which guarantees religious freedom?

9. Who is the current Senate Majority Leader, and what Party is he/she from?

10. Who is the current House Majority Leader, and what Party is he/she from?

11. True or False: Susan Rice was George W. Bush’s Secretary of State.

12. What is the Dodd-Frank Act, which was mentioned often in the 2012 primary debates and is now being debated between Romney & Obama?

13. What is “The Electoral College”?
     a. Elective courses at any university or college.
     b. A group of college graduates that studies elections.
     c. A representative body of U.S. citizens from each state.

14. Name the last three Presidents to have terms within the Twentieth Century.


1. Executive, legislative and judicial.

2. Joseph Biden is VP.; Next in line is Speaker of the House, currently John Boehner.

3. (c) the reason we have 3 branches of government.

4. False: That’s the Constitution. The Declaration of Independence starts out: “When, in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another…”

5. Not exactly. The Bill of Rights is the collective name for the first Ten Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

6. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson; and Abraham Lincoln was the 16th.

7. Dept. of State, Treasury, Defense, Justice, Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, Health & Human Services, Housing& Urban Development, Transportation, Energy, Education, Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security. All these departments make up the “Cabinet” and are in the Executive Branch with the President and Vice President.

8. Nineteenth Amendment and First Amendment.

9. Harry Reid, Democrat.

10. Eric Cantor, Republican.

11. False. Condoleeza Rice was George W. Bush’s Secretary of State. Susan Rice (no relation) is President Obama’s Ambassador to the United Nations.

12. Dodd-Frank is the Congressional Bill created by Congressman Barney Frank (D, MA) and Senator Chris Dodd (D, CT) that increased the number of restrictions on banks, financial institutions and related businesses after the collapse of Wall Street in the fall of 2008.

13. (c) a representative voting body of U.S. citizens from each state who elect the President and V.P. running mate on behalf of American voters. When we vote for a presidential team, that vote gets thrown behind the state’s “electoral representatives.” It’s often debated around elections whether giving more electorate votes to bigger states is really fair and representative of the entire population.

14. Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, William Clinton (his second term started in the 20th and extended into the 21st century).

How did you do? If you got 12-14 answers right, you’re an American Voting Superstar. For 9-11, you may be a little disappointed in your knowledge and be self-motivated to improve. For 7-8, please brush up by doing some research. For 6 or under, please take a formal course in U.S. Government before ever voting again!

Can you identify photos of America's highest officials? If you think so, go to this Politicians' Photo Quiz for American Voters.
read more "NonPartisan Quiz on U.S. Government for American Voters"

Friday, October 5, 2012

Pre-Election Economics 102: Of Taxes, Obamacare and Economy

In order to spare my readers a very long post, this is an overflow of info that didn't fit the topic in Pre-Election Economics 101. Here are some facts about America's current economy, new taxes, and Obamacare. 

I. The Blame Game:

President George W. Bush isn't to blame for everything. For example, the trouble with mortgage lending that led to the collapse of housing prices began escalating before his term. Even the liberal Time Magazine listed all these people ahead of Bush as responsible for the collapse: President Clinton, actions by Congress, consumers themselves (some who knowingly bought homes they couldn't afford) and bosses at big loan companies.

-During Bush's terms, unemployment had consistently fallen since 2003 and reached a low at 4.7% in Feb., 2006.

-The average gas price before the 2006 election was $1.50-2.00; When Democrats took control of Congress in 2006, it soared to $4.00 and hasn’t come down far since then.

-On September 4, 2012, the national debt surpassed $16 trillion for the first time in the nation's history. Under President Bush, the national debt grew by $4.89 trillion in eight years. But it's increased by another $5.38 trillion in President Obama's four years.
-It took President Obama just over 3.5 years to incur as much debt as 42 other American presidents combined.

II. Taxes:

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says ending Bush tax cuts and increases in taxes will dampen economic growth in the short term and cost a substantial amount in the long run.
Raising taxes is not the only way to lower deficits. Republican Governors all over the country and its islands have been lowering their state budget deficits without raising taxes, including Kasich of Ohio, Christie of New Jersey and Martinez of New Mexico. Governor Fortuno of Puerto Rico slashed taxes and his own salary to improve Puerto Rico's budget.

III. Taxes and Obamacare:

Don’t forget - the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision that Obamacare is a Tax. Most people thought Justice Roberts' decision was bad - but it was good in this respect: It clarified Obamacare as a tax on the middle class; and unfortunate in this respect - it means the President's breaking his promise not to tax Middle America.
-66% of business owners say they will eliminate their healthcare choices and tell their employees to go on Obamacare because it will cost them so much money to keep other insurance plans (see the employer rules here).

-U.S. Senator John Thune, appearing on Fox News' On the Record told host Greta Van Susteren it will be so expensive for small businesses, that business owners will rather pay the $3,000 fine for not complying than cover their employees. This will throw everyone into Obamacare when people were promised there would be a choice.

-In fact, says the CBO for example, single Americans making less than $60,000 a year, and families of four with combined incomes of $123,000, will pay more than half of a new tax in Obamacare— $3.1 billion.

-Obamacare puts a 3.8% Medicare tax on home sales beginning January 1, 2013. There's a “high income threshold” but it's not fixed to account for inflation, so it will reach middle-class taxpayers who sell their homes if prices increase.

This new home sales tax is the first time the government will apply such a tax on unearned income specifically to help pay for something like ObamaCare. The National Association of Realtors called it “destructive,” “ill-advised” and predicts it will even hurt job creation.
IV. Economy and Employment:

Under Obama, the unemployment rate has remained above 8% for 40 straight months – the highest since the 1930’s, and it represents most of Obama’s time in office... But just today, it was announced that unemployment is now 7.8%. It “miraculously” fell below 8% only 1 month before the election, after President Obama’s whole first term above 8%, and only 2 days after President Obama was declared the loser of the first debate by even many“mainstream media.” That’s just weird, because…

For this same day, October 5, the Huffington Post – not a conservative publication – said that the real unemployment rate is 9.4% when you eliminate people who have stopped looking for jobs or collecting unemployment.
-The middle-American average household income in March, 2012 was down $4,300 from its average since Obama took office in January 2009. This means the median net worth of families plunged by 39% since 2009.

-The latest Bureau of Labor Statistics shows 780,000 more women out of work than in Jan. 2009.
-55% of small business owners say they would not start a business today, blaming President Obama's new restrictions on businesses.

Ask yourself this question:
Are you and your loved ones better off than you were four years ago? 

read more "Pre-Election Economics 102: Of Taxes, Obamacare and Economy "

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Why Doesn't Socialism Work in a Free Society?

An American president can't always do everything he promises. But something’s wrong when he promises to take the country in a direction that has brought other countries to their knees and took them out of world power.

Some voters may be too young to know Socialism doesn't work, or have never traveled to see what happens to countries when the goal is “redistribution of wealth” (there’s a new movement here in America to rename it “equal money”).
Taking money away from those we call “rich” to redistribute to those we call “poor” or “less fortunate” never works. It's a known tactic by leaders who take over governments and make empty promises to “benefit the broader good” of the nation.
World history proves that the money taken from wealthy individuals and companies never gets redistributed to the common citizens. It gets used to make government officials into fat, greedy tyrants with gold palaces who couldn't care less how the person on the street is living.

Then, the government brings independently owned companies under their thumb, and puts government people in charge. Again, the money never reaches the bourgeois – the common people.

Why does this happen? Because, ever since Eve ate the apple, man has had the fault of being corruptible. And nothing corrupts better than the love of money and power. We need only look at Marx, Stalin, Lenin and Hitler for proof of this. If these types of leaders don't force their way in, they are voted in by people who want the government to take care of everything. They are voted in by people who want "Change."

When the government plays Robin Hood without making good on their promises, this causes further oppression. Because of this process, there are then no wealthy people or successful companies that can hire people and non-working people can't buy stuff. Do you think you’ll have the job you want? Think again.

Under socialism, it is dictated what jobs are available (heard the term “shovel ready jobs” from the White House lately?) The government even runs grocery stores and schools, telling people what they can eat. The citizens are told how much money they can make before being penalized. Sound familiar?

President Obama criticizes capitalism’s “trickle down” economy – letting big business have tax breaks in order to have a healthy economy. But higher taxes for companies will be passed on to consumers – thereby just a different “trickle down effect.” Here’s an article at Economist’s Journey to Life that explains this process. Reality Jolt: Higher Company Tax = Higher Customer Prices and Less Energetic Economy!
Is Republican Mitt Romney rich? Yes, but aren’t many of our richest legislators, sports stars and movie celebrities solid Democrats? Recently, actor George Clooney held a $40,000 per person celebrity fundraiser for President Obama (Daily Caller, June 25). Clooney needed “rich people” to pay that.

Bernard Goldberg, usually a journalist for left-leaning TV outlets CBS and HBO, is author of the recent book Bias. He admits his experiences as part of the liberal media’s prejudice against conservatives. Now a news analyst, Goldberg speaks against Obama’s higher taxes for the wealthy, stating: “It’s estimated that a tax on top wage earners would bring in about $85 billion a year. But the federal government spends about $85 billion every eight and a half days” (, July 9).  

If increasing taxes for the top “wealthiest” Americans (by Obama’s measure, those with $250,000 per year or more) sustains the government for only eight and a half days, then what? Do we next take from people who have $50,000? Or $30,000?
Is your income next for higher taxes? See Socialism's failure further explained in this University of Michigan paper.
read more "Why Doesn't Socialism Work in a Free Society?"

20-20 Faith Sight © 2009-2011 Sheryl Young. Template by, Optimized by, Concept and design by April Lorier.